Who Decides? How Prescription Drug Affordability Review Boards Impact Patient Access

Who Decides? How Prescription Drug Affordability Review Boards Impact Patient Access

Individual states sometimes establish prescription drug affordability review boards to explore ways to lower prescription medication costs for Medicaid patients and reduce the impact on the state health care budget. State legislators pass laws to create prescription drug affordability review boards.

Read One-Pager

Read More

Who Decides? Pharmacy Benefit Managers & Medication Access

Who Decides? Pharmacy Benefit Managers & Medication Access

Patients who rely on prescription medication may encounter bureaucratic delays, high out-of-pocket costs or forced medication switching. These hurdles often stem from the work of middlemen known as pharmacy benefit managers.

Read One-Pager

Read More

Who Decides? How ICER Impacts Patient Access

Who Decides? How ICER Impacts Patient Access

The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review is a health economics organization that assesses the value of new drugs, medical devices and diagnostics. Though ICER is not a government entity, its decisions often impact medication coverage by public and private health plans.

Read One-Pager

Read More

Co-Pay Accumulator Adjustment Programs: What Policymakers Can do to Protect Patients

Co-Pay Accumulator Adjustment Programs: What Policymakers Can do to Protect Patients

Co-pay accumulator adjustment programs are presenting patients with an ugly surprise at the pharmacy counter: The card that helps them afford their medication no longer counts toward their annual deductible. As more insurers and employees institute these programs, patients face serious consequences, including medication abandonment, financial hardship and non-medical switching. Ensuring patients’ access to their medication requires viable policy solutions.

Read the Paper

Read More

Non-Medical Switching: A Position Statement

Non-Medical Switching: A Position Statement

For many patients with complex, chronic conditions, the process of identifying the right combination of medications takes considerable effort. Imagine then how patients feel when their insurance company forces them to change their medication on the basis of cost.

Read Position Statement

Read More

Co-Pay Accumulator Programs: A Position Statement

Co-Pay Accumulator Programs: A Position Statement

Co-pay coupons are a common tool to help patients with chronic conditions cover the cost of expensive medications. Historically, co-pay coupons’ value has counted toward a patient’s annual deductible. Once the deductible is met, the patients pays a modest co-pay – a fixed amount – per prescription.

Read Position Statement

Read More

A Study of the Qualitative Impact of Non-Medical Switching

A Study of the Qualitative Impact of Non-Medical Switching

The story has become a familiar one. A patient with a chronic condition works with his or her doctor to find the right treatment. The condition is stabilized, manageable.

But then that stable patient is driven by the insurance company to a drug that’s less expensive. The switch prioritizes insurers’ profit over patients’ health. And it often comes with consequences: new side effects, re-emerging symptoms that had been under control, or interactions with medication the patient takes for other conditions.

Now, for the first time, a national study puts data points behind the story – providing a clear, measurable look at the qualitative impact of non-medical switching. This report details the findings of two in-person focus groups as well as a national poll of 800 patients who experienced non-medical switching firsthand.

Download the Paper | Download the Abstract

Read More

Physician's Perspective: Co-Pay Accumulator Adjustment Programs

Physician's Perspective: Co-Pay Accumulator Adjustment Programs

Not everyone can afford the medication they need. To make drugs more accessible, manufacturers sometimes provide co-pay coupons to help patients cover their out-ofpocket pharmacy expenses.

Manufacturers have issued co-pay coupons since the mid-2000s, but they have become more common in recent years. The amount of prescriptions paid for using coupons reached 19 percent in 2016.

Most drugs that have co-pay coupons don’t have lower-cost generic alternatives. For the few that do, these alternatives may not suit the unique characteristics of a patient’s medical history or disease state. Or, a patient has already tried the less expensive option and found it ineffective.

Regardless of what may be available, doctors should be trusted to prescribe the most appropriate medication for their individual patients. And when a doctor prescribes a costly regimen, until recently, patients could depend upon co-pay coupons to count toward their yearly out-of-pocket deductible. Many patients relied on this arrangement to access their medications.

Yet for patients across the country, that reality is changing.

Download the Paper

Read More

Protecting Access to Diabetes Care

Protecting Access to Diabetes Care

Almost 1 in 10 Americans – men, women, and children of all ethnicities and income levels – has diabetes. One of the most common medical conditions in America, diabetes has become more widespread in recent years, increasing by more 1 million people between 2012 and 2015 alone.

Not surprisingly, diabetes is an expensive disease. In 2017 diabetes cost the United States $237 billion in direct medical costs and $90 billion in reduced productivity, accounting for about one in every four health care dollars spent. People with diabetes incurred an average per-patient cost of $16,750 a year.

Diabetes’ impact and prevalence demand policies that allow people to access appropriate medications and effective health care.

Download the Paper

Read More